The city of Porto Alegre (RS) has sanctioned a bill approved by the Municipal Chamber that was drafted by ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence that exchanges text messages.
What happened
The bill, signed on the 23rd, was authored by councilman Ramiro Rosário (PSDB), who explained on social media how the proposal was made. “The command was simple: create a bill that prevents charging. The AI from OpenAI created the entire project in seconds, including the justification, using its own parameters. The AI also suggested improvements to the original proposal on its own.”
The city of Porto Alegre (RS) has made headlines with the recent sanctioning of a bill that has raised eyebrows due to its unconventional origins. The bill, which was approved by the Municipal Chamber, was actually drafted by an artificial intelligence system known as ChatGPT. This innovative approach to lawmaking has sparked significant interest and discussion within the local community.
Councilman Ramiro Rosário (PSDB) took to social media to shed light on the unique process behind the bill’s creation. According to Rosário, the directive given to ChatGPT was straightforward: develop a bill aimed at preventing certain types of charges. In a surprising turn of events, the AI system from OpenAI swiftly generated the entire project, including the accompanying justification, in a matter of seconds. What’s more, the AI even proposed its own enhancements to the original proposal, showcasing a level of autonomy and creativity that has amazed many.
The use of artificial intelligence in the legislative process has opened up a host of intriguing questions and considerations. While some have applauded the efficiency and innovation demonstrated by this approach, others have raised concerns about the potential implications of relying on AI for such critical decision-making processes. Is this a glimpse into the future of lawmaking, or does it raise ethical and practical issues that need to be carefully addressed?
As Porto Alegre prepares to implement the newly sanctioned bill, the broader implications of this landmark development are sure to be the subject of ongoing dialogue and scrutiny. The intersection of technology and governance has once again come to the fore, prompting a reevaluation of traditional methods and a contemplation of the possibilities that lie ahead. Only time will tell how this pioneering use of AI in lawmaking will shape the city’s policies and set a precedent for future endeavors.
